I agree - but for a different reason.
This is not the kind of hobby that benefits from a lot of public scrutiny.
Its not good for the girls - its not good for us.
The amount of people (men in this area, as Ive only seen one female post - and she was not posting happy thoughts) - but even though the number of posters may be a few select individuals - it is apparent by the reactive increase in not only activity - but requests after any given review or comment - the readership far exceeds the participation.
Sky is a typical example - it was nothing when it opened up - yet shortly after its first few reviews started showing up - the place got packed - and the girls got freaked because they had guys coming in off the street who they did not know - yet these dudes knew just about everything about not only them, but what they would do and would not do.
Lee's is another example of the same thing. And what about Annie in Woodland. The exposure ran her right out of town!
Am I suggesting that we no longer review? Of course not - that would be ludicrous. But at the same time I dont think being the most vocal and the most actively spouting of experiences is something to be shouting out either.
I know I have curtailed my postings - some for personal reasons - and some for the simple fact that you dont know anything about the people on the site - because even when you think you know them - they are capable of stabbing you in the back at any time. Annonymity is great for the hobby - its also a great mask of character. No one is really held to anything here other than a screen name and a freedom to spout off whatever they feel like - whether its true or bullshit.
Anyway - I'm off on a tangent.... but I too, dont believe that being the most visible and vocal group on this site - has many merits.
Just my opinion, of course.